Fix misleading mentions of tp_size in comments (GH-9093)

Many type object initializations labeled a field "tp_size" in the
comment, but the name of that field is tp_basicsize.
This commit is contained in:
Peter Eisentraut 2018-09-10 18:46:08 +02:00 • committed by Benjamin Peterson
parent d545869d08
commit 0e0bc4e221
15 changed files with 21 additions and 21 deletions

View file

@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ PyDoc_STRVAR(abc_data_doc,
static PyTypeObject _abc_data_type = {
PyVarObject_HEAD_INIT(&PyType_Type, 0)
"_abc_data", /*tp_name*/
sizeof(_abc_data), /*tp_size*/
sizeof(_abc_data), /*tp_basicsize*/
.tp_dealloc = (destructor)abc_data_dealloc,
.tp_flags = Py_TPFLAGS_DEFAULT,
.tp_alloc = PyType_GenericAlloc,