Make sure the list.sort's decorate step unwinds itself before returning

an exception raised by the key function.
(Suggested by Michael Hudson.)
This commit is contained in:
Raymond Hettinger 2003-11-28 21:43:02 +00:00
parent b310591169
commit 37e136373e
2 changed files with 16 additions and 2 deletions

View file

@ -186,6 +186,13 @@ class TestDecorateSortUndecorate(unittest.TestCase):
data = 'The quick Brown fox Jumped over The lazy Dog'.split()
self.assertRaises(TypeError, data.sort, "bad", str.lower)
def test_key_with_exception(self):
# Verify that the wrapper has been removed
data = range(-2,2)
dup = data[:]
self.assertRaises(ZeroDivisionError, data.sort, None, lambda x: 1/x)
self.assertEqual(data, dup)
def test_reverse(self):
data = range(100)
random.shuffle(data)

View file

@ -1876,8 +1876,15 @@ listsort(PyListObject *self, PyObject *args, PyObject *kwds)
value = PyList_GET_ITEM(self, i);
key = PyObject_CallFunctionObjArgs(keyfunc, value,
NULL);
if (key == NULL)
if (key == NULL) {
for (i=i-1 ; i>=0 ; i--) {
kvpair = PyList_GET_ITEM(self, i);
value = sortwrapper_getvalue(kvpair);
PyList_SET_ITEM(self, i, value);
Py_DECREF(kvpair);
}
goto dsu_fail;
}
kvpair = build_sortwrapper(key, value);
if (kvpair == NULL)
goto dsu_fail;
@ -1885,7 +1892,7 @@ listsort(PyListObject *self, PyObject *args, PyObject *kwds)
}
}
/* Reverse sort stability achieved by initialially reversing the list,
/* Reverse sort stability achieved by initially reversing the list,
applying a stable forward sort, then reversing the final result. */
if (reverse && self->ob_size > 1)
reverse_slice(self->ob_item, self->ob_item + self->ob_size);