Introducing additional functionality to allow client code to stop a unit

test when an assert fails. The following macro has been added: REQUIRE An example of when these type of checks are useful: std::vector<int> v = foo(); REQUIRE(CHECK_EQUAL(3, v.size())); // test stops here on a fail // so we don't segfault looking at // v[0] below. CHECK_EQUAL(1, v[0]); CHECK_EQUAL(2, v[1]); CHECK_EQUAL(3, v[2]); Multiple checks are supported as follows: REQUIRE({ CHECK_EQUAL(1, 2); CHECK(true); }; In the multiple check scenario, all the checks in the REQUIRE block will be run. After which, if any failures were reported, the TEST case will be stopped. When UNITTEST_NO_EXCEPTIONS is defined, REQUIRE is a noop.
2026-09-27 00:28:49 +03:00 · 2014-10-17 17:12:55 -05:00 · 2014-10-17 17:12:55 -05:00 · e7b56d4e3c
commit e7b56d4e3c
parent 5b34768df0
3 changed files with 871 additions and 0 deletions
--- a/UnitTest++/RequireMacros.h
+++ b/UnitTest++/RequireMacros.h
@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+#ifndef UNITTEST_REQUIREMACROS_H
+#define UNITTEST_REQUIREMACROS_H
+
+#include "HelperMacros.h"
+#include "ExceptionMacros.h"
+#include "CurrentTest.h"
+
+#ifdef REQUIRE
+    #error UnitTest++ redefines REQUIRE
+#endif
+
+#ifndef UNITTEST_NO_EXCEPTIONS
+    #define REQUIRE(test) \
+        UNITTEST_MULTILINE_MACRO_BEGIN \
+            int const failuresBeforeTest = UnitTest::CurrentTest::Results()->GetFailureCount(); \
+            test; \
+            int const failuresAfterTest = UnitTest::CurrentTest::Results()->GetFailureCount(); \
+            if(failuresAfterTest > failuresBeforeTest) \
+            { \
+                UT_THROW(UnitTest::AssertException()); \
+            } \
+        UNITTEST_MULTILINE_MACRO_END
+    #endif
+#endif
+
+#ifdef UNITTEST_NO_EXCEPTIONS
+    #define REQUIRE(test) test;
+#endif
--- a/UnitTest++/UnitTestPP.h
+++ b/UnitTest++/UnitTestPP.h
@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
 #include "Config.h"
 #include "TestMacros.h"
 #include "CheckMacros.h"
+#include "RequireMacros.h"
 #include "TestRunner.h"
 #include "TimeConstraint.h"
 #include "ReportAssert.h"
--- a/tests/TestRequireMacros.cpp
+++ b/tests/TestRequireMacros.cpp
@ -0,0 +1,842 @@
+#include "UnitTest++/UnitTestPP.h"
+#include "UnitTest++/CurrentTest.h"
+#include "RecordingReporter.h"
+#include "ScopedCurrentTest.h"
+
+using namespace std;
+
+#ifndef UNITTEST_NO_EXCEPTIONS
+
+namespace {
+
+TEST(RequireCheckSucceedsOnTrue)
+{
+    bool failure = true;
+    bool exception = false;
+    {
+        RecordingReporter reporter;
+        UnitTest::TestResults testResults(&reporter);
+
+		ScopedCurrentTest scopedResults(testResults);
+        
+        try
+        {
+            REQUIRE(CHECK(true));
+        }
+        catch(const UnitTest::AssertException&)
+        {
+            exception = true;
+        }
+        
+		failure = (testResults.GetFailureCount() > 0);
+    }
+
+    CHECK(!failure);
+    CHECK(!exception);
+}
+
+TEST(RequiredCheckFailsOnFalse)
+{
+    bool failure = false;
+    bool exception = false;
+    {
+        RecordingReporter reporter;
+        UnitTest::TestResults testResults(&reporter);
+		ScopedCurrentTest scopedResults(testResults);
+        
+        try
+        {
+            REQUIRE(CHECK(false));
+        }
+        catch (const UnitTest::AssertException&)
+        {
+            exception = true;
+        }
+        
+        failure = (testResults.GetFailureCount() > 0);
+    }
+
+    CHECK(failure);
+    CHECK(exception);
+}
+
+    
+TEST(RequireMacroSupportsMultipleChecks)
+{
+    bool failure = false;
+    bool exception = false;
+    {
+        RecordingReporter reporter;
+        UnitTest::TestResults testResults(&reporter);
+        ScopedCurrentTest scopedResults(testResults);
+        
+        try{
+            REQUIRE({
+                CHECK(true);
+                CHECK_EQUAL(1,1);
+            });
+        }
+        catch (const UnitTest::AssertException&)
+        {
+            exception = true;
+        }
+        
+        failure = (testResults.GetFailureCount() > 0);
+    }
+    
+    CHECK(!failure);
+    CHECK(!exception);
+}
+
+
+TEST(RequireMacroSupportsMultipleChecksWithFailingChecks)
+{
+    bool failure = false;
+    bool exception = false;
+    {
+        RecordingReporter reporter;
+        UnitTest::TestResults testResults(&reporter);
+        ScopedCurrentTest scopedResults(testResults);
+        
+        try{
+            REQUIRE({
+                CHECK(true);
+                CHECK_EQUAL(1,2);
+            });
+        }
+        catch (const UnitTest::AssertException&)
+        {
+            exception = true;
+        }
+        
+        failure = (testResults.GetFailureCount() > 0);
+    }
+    
+    CHECK(failure);
+    CHECK(exception);
+}
+    
+TEST(FailureReportsCorrectTestName)
+{
+    RecordingReporter reporter;
+    {
+        UnitTest::TestResults testResults(&reporter);
+		ScopedCurrentTest scopedResults(testResults);
+        
+        try
+        {
+            REQUIRE(CHECK(false));
+        }
+        catch (const UnitTest::AssertException&)
+        {
+        }
+    }
+
+    CHECK_EQUAL(m_details.testName, reporter.lastFailedTest);
+}
+
+TEST(RequiredCheckFailureIncludesCheckContents)
+{
+    RecordingReporter reporter;
+    {
+        UnitTest::TestResults testResults(&reporter);
+		ScopedCurrentTest scopedResults(testResults);
+        const bool yaddayadda = false;
+        
+        try
+        {
+            REQUIRE(CHECK(yaddayadda));
+        }
+        catch (const UnitTest::AssertException&)
+        {
+        }
+    }
+
+    CHECK(strstr(reporter.lastFailedMessage, "yaddayadda"));
+}
+
+TEST(RequiredCheckEqualSucceedsOnEqual)
+{
+    bool failure = true;
+    bool exception = false;
+    {
+        RecordingReporter reporter;
+        UnitTest::TestResults testResults(&reporter);
+		ScopedCurrentTest scopedResults(testResults);
+        
+        try
+        {
+            REQUIRE(CHECK_EQUAL(1,1));
+        }
+        catch (const UnitTest::AssertException&)
+        {
+            exception = true;
+        }
+
+        failure = (testResults.GetFailureCount() > 0);
+    }
+
+    CHECK(!failure);
+    CHECK(!exception);
+}
+
+TEST(RequiredCheckEqualFailsOnNotEqual)
+{
+    bool failure = false;
+    bool exception = false;
+    {
+        RecordingReporter reporter;
+        UnitTest::TestResults testResults(&reporter);
+		ScopedCurrentTest scopedResults(testResults);
+
+        try
+        {
+            REQUIRE(CHECK_EQUAL(1, 2));
+        }
+        catch (const UnitTest::AssertException&)
+        {
+            exception = true;
+        }
+
+        failure = (testResults.GetFailureCount() > 0);
+    }
+
+    CHECK(failure);
+    CHECK(exception);
+}
+
+TEST(RequiredCheckEqualFailureContainsCorrectDetails)
+{
+    int line = 0;
+    RecordingReporter reporter;
+    {
+        UnitTest::TestResults testResults(&reporter);
+		UnitTest::TestDetails const testDetails("testName", "suiteName", "filename", -1);
+		ScopedCurrentTest scopedResults(testResults, &testDetails);
+
+        try
+        {
+            line = __LINE__; REQUIRE(CHECK_EQUAL(1, 123));
+        }
+        catch (const UnitTest::AssertException&)
+        {
+        }
+    }
+
+    CHECK_EQUAL("testName", reporter.lastFailedTest);
+    CHECK_EQUAL("suiteName", reporter.lastFailedSuite);
+    CHECK_EQUAL("filename", reporter.lastFailedFile);
+    CHECK_EQUAL(line, reporter.lastFailedLine);
+}
+
+int g_sideEffect = 0;
+int FunctionWithSideEffects()
+{
+    ++g_sideEffect;
+    return 1;
+}
+
+TEST(RequiredCheckEqualDoesNotHaveSideEffectsWhenPassing)
+{
+    g_sideEffect = 0;
+    {
+        UnitTest::TestResults testResults;
+		ScopedCurrentTest scopedResults(testResults);
+        
+        try
+        {
+            REQUIRE(CHECK_EQUAL(1, FunctionWithSideEffects()));
+        }
+        catch (const UnitTest::AssertException&)
+        {
+        }
+    }
+    CHECK_EQUAL(1, g_sideEffect);
+}
+
+TEST(RequiredCheckEqualDoesNotHaveSideEffectsWhenFailing)
+{
+    g_sideEffect = 0;
+    {
+        UnitTest::TestResults testResults;
+		ScopedCurrentTest scopedResults(testResults);
+
+        try
+        {
+            REQUIRE(CHECK_EQUAL(2, FunctionWithSideEffects()));
+        }
+        catch (const UnitTest::AssertException&)
+        {
+        }
+    }
+    CHECK_EQUAL(1, g_sideEffect);
+}
+
+
+TEST(RequiredCheckCloseSucceedsOnEqual)
+{
+    bool failure = true;
+    bool exception = false;
+    {
+        RecordingReporter reporter;
+        UnitTest::TestResults testResults(&reporter);
+		ScopedCurrentTest scopedResults(testResults);
+
+        try
+        {
+            REQUIRE(CHECK_CLOSE(1.0f, 1.001f, 0.01f));
+        }
+        catch (const UnitTest::AssertException&)
+        {
+            exception = true;
+        }
+
+        failure = (testResults.GetFailureCount() > 0);
+    }
+
+    CHECK(!failure);
+    CHECK(!exception);
+}
+
+TEST(RequiredCheckCloseFailsOnNotEqual)
+{
+    bool failure = false;
+    bool exception = false;
+    {
+        RecordingReporter reporter;
+        UnitTest::TestResults testResults(&reporter);
+		ScopedCurrentTest scopedResults(testResults);
+        
+        try
+        {
+            REQUIRE(CHECK_CLOSE (1.0f, 1.1f, 0.01f));
+        }
+        catch (const UnitTest::AssertException&)
+        {
+            exception = true;
+        }
+        
+        failure = (testResults.GetFailureCount() > 0);
+    }
+
+    CHECK(failure);
+    CHECK(exception);
+}
+
+TEST(RequiredCheckCloseFailureContainsCorrectDetails)
+{
+    int line = 0;
+    RecordingReporter reporter;
+    {
+        UnitTest::TestResults testResults(&reporter);
+		UnitTest::TestDetails testDetails("test", "suite", "filename", -1);
+		ScopedCurrentTest scopedResults(testResults, &testDetails);
+
+        try
+        {
+            line = __LINE__; REQUIRE(CHECK_CLOSE(1.0f, 1.1f, 0.01f));
+            CHECK(false);
+        }
+        catch (const UnitTest::AssertException&)
+        {
+        }
+    }
+
+    CHECK_EQUAL("test", reporter.lastFailedTest);
+    CHECK_EQUAL("suite", reporter.lastFailedSuite);
+    CHECK_EQUAL("filename", reporter.lastFailedFile);
+    CHECK_EQUAL(line, reporter.lastFailedLine);
+}
+
+TEST(RequiredCheckCloseDoesNotHaveSideEffectsWhenPassing)
+{
+    g_sideEffect = 0;
+    {
+        UnitTest::TestResults testResults;
+		ScopedCurrentTest scopedResults(testResults);
+        
+        try
+        {
+            REQUIRE(CHECK_CLOSE (1, FunctionWithSideEffects(), 0.1f));
+        }
+        catch (const UnitTest::AssertException&)
+        {
+        }
+    }
+    CHECK_EQUAL(1, g_sideEffect);
+}
+
+TEST(RequiredCheckCloseDoesNotHaveSideEffectsWhenFailing)
+{
+    g_sideEffect = 0;
+    {
+        UnitTest::TestResults testResults;
+		ScopedCurrentTest scopedResults(testResults);
+        
+        try
+        {
+            REQUIRE(CHECK_CLOSE(2, FunctionWithSideEffects(), 0.1f));
+        }
+        catch (const UnitTest::AssertException&)
+        {
+        }
+    }
+    CHECK_EQUAL(1, g_sideEffect);
+}
+
+TEST(RequiredCheckArrayCloseSucceedsOnEqual)
+{
+    bool failure = true;
+    bool exception = false;
+    {
+        RecordingReporter reporter;
+        UnitTest::TestResults testResults(&reporter);
+		ScopedCurrentTest scopedResults(testResults);
+        const float data[4] = { 0, 1, 2, 3 };
+        
+        try
+        {
+            REQUIRE(CHECK_ARRAY_CLOSE (data, data, 4, 0.01f));
+        }
+        catch (const UnitTest::AssertException&)
+        {
+            exception = true;
+        }
+        
+        failure = (testResults.GetFailureCount() > 0);
+    }
+
+    CHECK(!failure);
+    CHECK(!exception);
+}
+
+TEST(RequiredCheckArrayCloseFailsOnNotEqual)
+{
+    bool failure = false;
+    bool exception = false;
+    {
+        RecordingReporter reporter;
+        UnitTest::TestResults testResults(&reporter);
+		ScopedCurrentTest scopedResults(testResults);
+
+		int const data1[4] = { 0, 1, 2, 3 };
+        int const data2[4] = { 0, 1, 3, 3 };
+        
+        try
+        {
+            REQUIRE(CHECK_ARRAY_CLOSE (data1, data2, 4, 0.01f));
+        }
+        catch (const UnitTest::AssertException&)
+        {
+            exception = true;
+        }
+
+		failure = (testResults.GetFailureCount() > 0);
+    }
+
+    CHECK(failure);
+    CHECK(exception);
+}
+
+TEST(RequiredCheckArrayCloseFailureIncludesCheckExpectedAndActual)
+{
+    RecordingReporter reporter;
+    {
+        UnitTest::TestResults testResults(&reporter);
+		ScopedCurrentTest scopedResults(testResults);
+
+		int const data1[4] = { 0, 1, 2, 3 };
+        int const data2[4] = { 0, 1, 3, 3 };
+        
+        try
+        {
+            REQUIRE(CHECK_ARRAY_CLOSE(data1, data2, 4, 0.01f));
+        }
+        catch (const UnitTest::AssertException&)
+        {
+        }
+    }
+
+    CHECK(strstr(reporter.lastFailedMessage, "xpected [ 0 1 2 3 ]"));
+    CHECK(strstr(reporter.lastFailedMessage, "was [ 0 1 3 3 ]"));
+}
+
+TEST(RequiredCheckArrayCloseFailureContainsCorrectDetails)
+{
+    int line = 0;
+    RecordingReporter reporter;
+    {
+        UnitTest::TestResults testResults(&reporter);
+		UnitTest::TestDetails testDetails("arrayCloseTest", "arrayCloseSuite", "filename", -1);
+		ScopedCurrentTest scopedResults(testResults, &testDetails);
+
+		int const data1[4] = { 0, 1, 2, 3 };
+        int const data2[4] = { 0, 1, 3, 3 };
+        
+        try
+        {
+            line = __LINE__; REQUIRE(CHECK_ARRAY_CLOSE (data1, data2, 4, 0.01f));
+        }
+        catch (const UnitTest::AssertException&)
+        {
+        }
+    }
+
+    CHECK_EQUAL("arrayCloseTest", reporter.lastFailedTest);
+    CHECK_EQUAL("arrayCloseSuite", reporter.lastFailedSuite);
+    CHECK_EQUAL("filename", reporter.lastFailedFile);
+    CHECK_EQUAL(line, reporter.lastFailedLine);
+}
+
+TEST(RequiredCheckArrayCloseFailureIncludesTolerance)
+{
+    RecordingReporter reporter;
+    {
+        UnitTest::TestResults testResults(&reporter);
+		ScopedCurrentTest scopedResults(testResults);
+
+		float const data1[4] = { 0, 1, 2, 3 };
+        float const data2[4] = { 0, 1, 3, 3 };
+        
+        try
+        {
+            REQUIRE(CHECK_ARRAY_CLOSE (data1, data2, 4, 0.01f));
+        }
+        catch (const UnitTest::AssertException&)
+        {
+        }
+    }
+
+    CHECK(strstr(reporter.lastFailedMessage, "0.01"));
+}
+
+TEST(RequiredCheckArrayEqualSuceedsOnEqual)
+{
+    bool failure = true;
+    bool exception = false;
+    {
+        RecordingReporter reporter;
+        UnitTest::TestResults testResults(&reporter);
+		ScopedCurrentTest scopedResults(testResults);
+
+		const float data[4] = { 0, 1, 2, 3 };
+        
+        try
+        {
+            REQUIRE(CHECK_ARRAY_EQUAL (data, data, 4));
+        }
+        catch (const UnitTest::AssertException&)
+        {
+            exception = true;
+        }
+        
+		failure = (testResults.GetFailureCount() > 0);
+    }
+
+    CHECK(!failure);
+    CHECK(!exception);
+}
+
+TEST(RequiredCheckArrayEqualFailsOnNotEqual)
+{
+    bool failure = false;
+    bool exception = false;
+    {
+        RecordingReporter reporter;
+        UnitTest::TestResults testResults(&reporter);
+		ScopedCurrentTest scopedResults(testResults);
+
+		int const data1[4] = { 0, 1, 2, 3 };
+        int const data2[4] = { 0, 1, 3, 3 };
+        
+        try
+        {
+            REQUIRE(CHECK_ARRAY_EQUAL (data1, data2, 4));
+        }
+        catch (const UnitTest::AssertException&)
+        {
+            exception = true;
+        }
+        
+		failure = (testResults.GetFailureCount() > 0);
+    }
+
+    CHECK(failure);
+    CHECK(exception);
+}
+
+TEST(RequiredCheckArrayEqualFailureIncludesCheckExpectedAndActual)
+{
+    RecordingReporter reporter;
+    {
+        UnitTest::TestResults testResults(&reporter);
+		ScopedCurrentTest scopedResults(testResults);
+
+		int const data1[4] = { 0, 1, 2, 3 };
+        int const data2[4] = { 0, 1, 3, 3 };
+        
+        try
+        {
+            REQUIRE(CHECK_ARRAY_EQUAL (data1, data2, 4));
+        }
+        catch (const UnitTest::AssertException&)
+        {
+        }
+    }
+
+    CHECK(strstr(reporter.lastFailedMessage, "xpected [ 0 1 2 3 ]"));
+    CHECK(strstr(reporter.lastFailedMessage, "was [ 0 1 3 3 ]"));
+}
+
+TEST(RequiredCheckArrayEqualFailureContainsCorrectInfo)
+{
+    int line = 0;
+    RecordingReporter reporter;
+    {
+        UnitTest::TestResults testResults(&reporter);
+		ScopedCurrentTest scopedResults(testResults);
+
+		int const data1[4] = { 0, 1, 2, 3 };
+        int const data2[4] = { 0, 1, 3, 3 };
+        
+        try
+        {
+            line = __LINE__; REQUIRE(CHECK_ARRAY_EQUAL (data1, data2, 4));
+        }
+        catch (const UnitTest::AssertException&)
+        {
+        }
+    }
+
+    CHECK_EQUAL("RequiredCheckArrayEqualFailureContainsCorrectInfo", reporter.lastFailedTest);
+    CHECK_EQUAL(__FILE__, reporter.lastFailedFile);
+    CHECK_EQUAL(line, reporter.lastFailedLine);
+}
+
+float const* FunctionWithSideEffects2()
+{
+    ++g_sideEffect;
+    static float const data[] = {1,2,3,4};
+    return data;
+}
+
+TEST(RequiredCheckArrayCloseDoesNotHaveSideEffectsWhenPassing)
+{
+    g_sideEffect = 0;
+    {
+        UnitTest::TestResults testResults;
+		ScopedCurrentTest scopedResults(testResults);
+
+		const float data[] = { 0, 1, 2, 3 };
+        
+        try
+        {
+            REQUIRE(CHECK_ARRAY_CLOSE (data, FunctionWithSideEffects2(), 4, 0.01f));
+        }
+        catch (const UnitTest::AssertException&)
+        {
+        }
+    }
+    CHECK_EQUAL(1, g_sideEffect);
+}
+
+TEST(RequiredCheckArrayCloseDoesNotHaveSideEffectsWhenFailing)
+{
+    g_sideEffect = 0;
+    {
+        UnitTest::TestResults testResults;
+		ScopedCurrentTest scopedResults(testResults);
+
+		const float data[] = { 0, 1, 3, 3 };
+        
+        try
+        {
+            REQUIRE(CHECK_ARRAY_CLOSE (data, FunctionWithSideEffects2(), 4, 0.01f));
+        }
+        catch (const UnitTest::AssertException&)
+        {
+        }
+    }
+
+	CHECK_EQUAL(1, g_sideEffect);
+}
+
+TEST(RequiredCheckArray2DCloseSucceedsOnEqual)
+{
+    bool failure = true;
+    bool exception = false;
+    {
+        RecordingReporter reporter;
+        UnitTest::TestResults testResults(&reporter);
+		ScopedCurrentTest scopedResults(testResults);
+
+		const float data[2][2] = { {0, 1}, {2, 3} };
+        
+        try
+        {
+            REQUIRE(CHECK_ARRAY2D_CLOSE(data, data, 2, 2, 0.01f));
+        }
+        catch (const UnitTest::AssertException&)
+        {
+            exception = true;
+        }
+        
+		failure = (testResults.GetFailureCount() > 0);
+    }
+
+    CHECK(!failure);
+    CHECK(!exception);
+}
+
+TEST(RequiredCheckArray2DCloseFailsOnNotEqual)
+{
+    bool failure = false;
+    bool exception = false;
+    {
+        RecordingReporter reporter;
+        UnitTest::TestResults testResults(&reporter);
+		ScopedCurrentTest scopedResults(testResults);
+
+		int const data1[2][2] = { {0, 1}, {2, 3} };
+        int const data2[2][2] = { {0, 1}, {3, 3} };
+        
+        try
+        {
+            REQUIRE(CHECK_ARRAY2D_CLOSE (data1, data2, 2, 2, 0.01f));
+        }
+        catch (const UnitTest::AssertException&)
+        {
+            exception = true;
+        }
+
+		failure = (testResults.GetFailureCount() > 0);
+    }
+
+    CHECK(failure);
+    CHECK(exception);
+}
+
+TEST(RequiredCheckArray2DCloseFailureIncludesCheckExpectedAndActual)
+{
+    RecordingReporter reporter;
+    {
+        UnitTest::TestResults testResults(&reporter);
+		ScopedCurrentTest scopedResults(testResults);
+
+		int const data1[2][2] = { {0, 1}, {2, 3} };
+        int const data2[2][2] = { {0, 1}, {3, 3} };
+
+        try
+        {
+            REQUIRE(CHECK_ARRAY2D_CLOSE (data1, data2, 2, 2, 0.01f));
+        }
+        catch (const UnitTest::AssertException&)
+        {
+        }
+    }
+
+    CHECK(strstr(reporter.lastFailedMessage, "xpected [ [ 0 1 ] [ 2 3 ] ]"));
+    CHECK(strstr(reporter.lastFailedMessage, "was [ [ 0 1 ] [ 3 3 ] ]"));
+}
+
+TEST(RequiredCheckArray2DCloseFailureContainsCorrectDetails)
+{
+    int line = 0;
+    RecordingReporter reporter;
+    {
+        UnitTest::TestResults testResults(&reporter);
+		UnitTest::TestDetails testDetails("array2DCloseTest", "array2DCloseSuite", "filename", -1);
+		ScopedCurrentTest scopedResults(testResults, &testDetails);
+
+		int const data1[2][2] = { {0, 1}, {2, 3} };
+        int const data2[2][2] = { {0, 1}, {3, 3} };
+        
+        try
+        {
+            line = __LINE__; REQUIRE(CHECK_ARRAY2D_CLOSE (data1, data2, 2, 2, 0.01f));
+        }
+        catch (const UnitTest::AssertException&)
+        {
+        }
+    }
+
+    CHECK_EQUAL("array2DCloseTest", reporter.lastFailedTest);
+    CHECK_EQUAL("array2DCloseSuite", reporter.lastFailedSuite);
+    CHECK_EQUAL("filename", reporter.lastFailedFile);
+    CHECK_EQUAL(line, reporter.lastFailedLine);
+}
+
+TEST(RequiredCheckArray2DCloseFailureIncludesTolerance)
+{
+    RecordingReporter reporter;
+    {
+        UnitTest::TestResults testResults(&reporter);
+		ScopedCurrentTest scopedResults(testResults);
+
+		float const data1[2][2] = { {0, 1}, {2, 3} };
+        float const data2[2][2] = { {0, 1}, {3, 3} };
+        
+        try
+        {
+            REQUIRE(CHECK_ARRAY2D_CLOSE (data1, data2, 2, 2, 0.01f));
+        }
+        catch (const UnitTest::AssertException&)
+        {
+        }
+    }
+
+    CHECK(strstr(reporter.lastFailedMessage, "0.01"));
+}
+
+float const* const* FunctionWithSideEffects3()
+{
+    ++g_sideEffect;
+    static float const data1[] = {0,1};
+    static float const data2[] = {2,3};
+    static const float* const data[] = {data1, data2};
+    return data;
+}
+
+TEST(RequiredCheckArray2DCloseDoesNotHaveSideEffectsWhenPassing)
+{
+    g_sideEffect = 0;
+    {
+        UnitTest::TestResults testResults;
+		ScopedCurrentTest scopedResults(testResults);
+
+		const float data[2][2] = { {0, 1}, {2, 3} };
+        
+        try
+        {
+            REQUIRE(CHECK_ARRAY2D_CLOSE (data, FunctionWithSideEffects3(), 2, 2, 0.01f));
+        }
+        catch (const UnitTest::AssertException&)
+        {
+        }
+    }
+    CHECK_EQUAL(1, g_sideEffect);
+}
+
+TEST(RequiredCheckArray2DCloseDoesNotHaveSideEffectsWhenFailing)
+{
+    g_sideEffect = 0;
+    {
+        UnitTest::TestResults testResults;
+		ScopedCurrentTest scopedResults(testResults);
+
+		const float data[2][2] = { {0, 1}, {3, 3} };
+        
+        try
+        {
+            REQUIRE(CHECK_ARRAY2D_CLOSE (data, FunctionWithSideEffects3(), 2, 2, 0.01f));
+        }
+        catch (const UnitTest::AssertException&)
+        {
+        }
+    }
+    CHECK_EQUAL(1, g_sideEffect);
+}
+
+}
+
+#endif